Changes in Management of PETERKA & PARTNERS
PETERKA & PARTNERS is very pleased to announce the continued successful growth of the firm and promotion of the following colleagues: Lubomír Leško was appointed Partner and Director for Slovakia, Natália Tunegová became Senior Associate and Deputy Director for Slovakia. Under leadership of Lubomír Leško, Natália will co-manage the Slovak office. Lubomír has been practicing […]
Legal support to MAMMOET: Work permits in Ukraine
The Kyiv office of PETERKA & PARTNERS has successfully and fully supported MAMMOET, a well-known group of companies providing engineered heavy lifting and transport services, in relation to obtaining more than 40 work permits for professionals since August 2018.
Ukrainian Office of PETERKA & PARTNERS supported 9th International Book Arsenal Festival
The Ukrainian Office of PETERKA & PARTNERS supported the Czech Centre Kyiv in its partnership with the 9th International Book Arsenal Festival, taking place from 22 to 26 May in Kyiv. The Festival offers a wonderful exhibition-fair for books, and in 2019 the focus was on the theme of co-existence, i.e., intercultural, inter-historical and inter-political […]
Civil circulation and destruction of counterfeit goods suspended by customs authorities: milestone decision by Supreme Court of Ukraine to resolve ambiguity
The Kyiv office of PETERKA & PARTNERS has successfully defended the intellectual property rights of the client, before the Supreme Court of Ukraine. The dispute concerned, in particular, the ambiguous issue of the civil circulation and destruction of counterfeit goods suspended for release by the customs authorities due to infringement of trademark rights.
PETERKA & PARTNERS Ukraine successfully assists in lifting of special sanctions
PETERKA & PARTNERS Ukraine successfully assisted its client in the process of having special sanctions imposed on the company by Ukrainian state authorities lifted. The assistance included legal advisory on the process of having the special sanctions lifted and the preparation of the necessary documents.
PETERKA & PARTNERS once again recommended by Legal500 and by Media Law International
We are delighted to inform you that the latest edition (2019) of Legal500 EMEA, a prestigious publication on the legal services market, recommends PETERKA & PARTNERS in several practice areas in six countries and that our firm has retained its positions and confirmed its outstanding reputation on the CEE market. We are proud to announce […]
PETERKA & PARTNERS Ukraine successfully advises Mammoet
PETERKA & PARTNERS Ukraine provided Mammoet, a global leader in heavy lifting and transport, with legal assistance regarding the involvement of the client in the reconstruction of Shuliavsky Bridge in Kyiv. The Ukrainian office successfully advised Mammoet on a number of issues, in particular, on negotiating and signing of the documents related to the provision […]
Ukrainian office advised Flawless Money Ltd
PETERKA & PARTNERS Ukraine advised Flawless Money Ltd on the regulatory aspects of using one of the world’s most popular online payment systems for processing payment transactions of Ukrainian customers by a multinational technology company that specializes in Internet-related services and products. Flawless Money Ltd is a UK-based consultancy company focusing on payments and dealing […]
Taras Utiralov recognized in “Client Choice: TOP 100 Lawyers in Ukraine – 2018”
In the annual “Client Choice: TOP 100 Lawyers in Ukraine – 2018” survey by the Ukrainian Yurydychna Gazeta (The Legal Journal), Taras Utiralov, Partner and Director for the PETERKA & PARTNERS Ukrainian office, and Leader of the Law of Information Technologies Practice at the firm, was recognized as one of the leaders in TMT (Technology, […]
Successful representation of interests of ABRO INDUSTRIES, Inc.
The Kyiv office of PETERKA & PARTNERS successfully protected the intellectual property rights of ABRO INDUSTRIES, Inc., a well-known company producing top-quality automotive, industrial and consumer products, to its registered trademark in the court of first instance in a case regarding the cancellation of the registration of a similar trademark of a third party.